![]() We would cry for luck, if there would be a minimum common programming interfaces under Linux, but it isn't - the currentĬommon "minimum" is indeed rather small (think about the several C-runtime versions only, poor Unicode support etc. ![]() in other words, it is Linux itself making our lifes so hard here ! Not to forget, several features are not yet available under Linux, as we did not found a stable code version yet, which worksĬonstantly even with the few major distirbutions. btw., do you work for free ? :-)Īnd especially for Linux we know what we are talking about :-) Struggeling with many many many issues along so many distributions, I have huge respect for all developers which are able to provide their software for free, no doubt - I also use many of them īut I have also to respect that some developers have to earn their living from. You can not use such a philosophy as base for a commercial software. Software is never perfect, many issues + faults are even found during lifetime. This means, you will have to wait with an upgrade for the next 33 years :-) ![]() "For fixes, I'd expect no cost, as you say." Basically, when a feature is to *intended* to be implemented for a specified version, then it should be, indeed, I agree īut that comparision is probably not up-to-date, several (1) marked features are already available for Linux, like Lisp encryption.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |