![]() ![]() In this example, you’ll run it on the internal SSD of your M1 Mac, where it requires around 35 GB of free space for the test files. You can perform this test on as many different types of storage as you wish. ![]() It’ll do that by reading those 160 test files, in randomised order, a total of ten times each. What you’ll do is start by running a basic write benchmark, which is primarily intended to provide 160 test files for a more sustained read test, which will measure the rate at which 1600 files of different sizes, totalling over 320 GB, can be read. For this workthrough, I’ll assume that the most performance-critical use of your Mac is going to be sustained high-speed reading, and the benchmark that you want must give a good indication of the read rate which can be sustained by regular apps over periods of many minutes. Unlike other storage benchmarking apps, Stibium provides a great deal of flexibility. In this article, I’ll show how you can use my free app Stibium to compare the two options a bit more objectively. It’s become one of the commonest questions: should you pay extra for a larger SSD in your new M1 Mac, or will you get as good performance at a better price with a cheaper internal SSD and fast external storage? Now that manufacturers are claiming that their external SSDs are much faster than regular SATA/USB-C models, it’s tempting to believe them, and save some money on the cost of your Mac.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |